Page 1 of 1
Calling all SC Applicants
Posted: Tue, 20 May 2014 9:57 am
by kcsyfne
I applied for SC since July 2013. Almost a year, but till today no call nor reply from ICA. Anyone facing the same scenario? please share. Does this means chances of getting approved is higher?
Posted: Tue, 20 May 2014 10:59 am
by ful babu
not necessarily, a friend of mine received his rejection letter after 14 months of waiting.
Best
Posted: Tue, 20 May 2014 11:30 am
by ecureilx
ful babu wrote:not necessarily, a friend of mine received his rejection letter after 14 months of waiting.
Best
I know one who got rejected after 26 months ....
Posted: Tue, 20 May 2014 12:17 pm
by lfo_24
kcsyfne, mind telling us your profile... maybe somehow, it plays a part, just my guess
Posted: Tue, 20 May 2014 12:18 pm
by kcsyfne
ful babu wrote:not necessarily, a friend of mine received his rejection letter after 14 months of waiting.
OMG!!! i need to also prepare myself for rejection.. -.-|||||||
Posted: Tue, 20 May 2014 12:21 pm
by kcsyfne
lfo_24 wrote:kcsyfne, mind telling us your profile... maybe somehow, it plays a part, just my guess
Applying for both myself and daughter age 29 months old. Wanted to apply as a family but unfortunately, my hubby's PR is less than 3 years so he cant apply at the moment of time.
Working as admin. Salary per mth 2.5+. Resided in SG 10 years back. Deliver my daughter in Singapore. Age 29.
Posted: Tue, 20 May 2014 12:21 pm
by sundaymorningstaple
You should have prepared yourself for that the day you sent the application in.

Posted: Tue, 20 May 2014 12:22 pm
by kcsyfne
ecureilx wrote:ful babu wrote:not necessarily, a friend of mine received his rejection letter after 14 months of waiting.
Best
I know one who got rejected after 26 months ....
That's long. Single applicant?
Posted: Tue, 20 May 2014 12:26 pm
by kcsyfne
sundaymorningstaple wrote:You should have prepared yourself for that the day you sent the application in.

but many told me the longer the wait, the higher chances
And furthermore, my colleague (married but applied for herself only) applied a week before me and got her rejection after waited for 7 mths.
Posted: Tue, 20 May 2014 12:35 pm
by the lynx
kcsyfne wrote:sundaymorningstaple wrote:You should have prepared yourself for that the day you sent the application in.

but many told me the longer the wait, the higher chances
And furthermore, my colleague (married but applied for herself only) applied a week before me and got her rejection after waited for 7 mths.
More like there is something in her application profile that helped ICA to make a decision quicker (i.e. to reject her).
Time is not a yardstick to the success of application. Why the rush, by the way?
Posted: Tue, 20 May 2014 1:47 pm
by kcsyfne
the lynx wrote:kcsyfne wrote:sundaymorningstaple wrote:You should have prepared yourself for that the day you sent the application in.

but many told me the longer the wait, the higher chances
And furthermore, my colleague (married but applied for herself only) applied a week before me and got her rejection after waited for 7 mths.
More like there is something in her application profile that helped ICA to make a decision quicker (i.e. to reject her).
Time is not a yardstick to the success of application. Why the rush, by the way?
My 1st baby turning 3 this year.. planning for second baby. Don't wanna go through the hassle of applying SC again. And of course, planning to get a BTO
Posted: Tue, 20 May 2014 2:53 pm
by PNGMK
kcsyfne wrote:the lynx wrote:kcsyfne wrote:
but many told me the longer the wait, the higher chances
And furthermore, my colleague (married but applied for herself only) applied a week before me and got her rejection after waited for 7 mths.
More like there is something in her application profile that helped ICA to make a decision quicker (i.e. to reject her).
Time is not a yardstick to the success of application. Why the rush, by the way?
My 1st baby turning 3 this year.. planning for second baby. Don't wanna go through the hassle of applying SC again. And of course, planning to get a BTO
And RIGHT THERE lady is why you should not get SC.
Posted: Tue, 20 May 2014 5:28 pm
by kcsyfne
PNGMK wrote:kcsyfne wrote:the lynx wrote:
More like there is something in her application profile that helped ICA to make a decision quicker (i.e. to reject her).
Time is not a yardstick to the success of application. Why the rush, by the way?
My 1st baby turning 3 this year.. planning for second baby. Don't wanna go through the hassle of applying SC again. And of course, planning to get a BTO
And RIGHT THERE lady is why you should not get SC.
Erm..what do you mean?
Posted: Tue, 20 May 2014 8:16 pm
by PNGMK
kcsyfne wrote:PNGMK wrote:kcsyfne wrote:
My 1st baby turning 3 this year.. planning for second baby. Don't wanna go through the hassle of applying SC again. And of course, planning to get a BTO
And RIGHT THERE lady is why you should not get SC.
Erm..what do you mean?
Applying for SC, purely to avail yourself of a financial subsidy for SC, is completely not what the ICA wants to see in future citizens.
Posted: Wed, 21 May 2014 10:05 am
by kcsyfne
PNGMK wrote:kcsyfne wrote:PNGMK wrote:
And RIGHT THERE lady is why you should not get SC.
Erm..what do you mean?
Applying for SC, purely to avail yourself of a financial subsidy for SC, is completely not what the ICA wants to see in future citizens.
That was my initial reason. But not anymore now. Planning to get a resale. Another reason is that my whole family is in Sg now. And my mum is a SC by birth. She married to my dad and resided in Mlys all the while and came back to SG 3 years ago. I don't plan to go back malaysia anymore.
