Page 1 of 2
Pitiful Sight
Posted: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 3:40 am
by may4
China bride dumped bacause she wanted to keep baby
Husband: I DUMPED my wife because she decided to have the baby against my will.
Mrs Ng spent her first night at a neighbourhood police post, but is now putting up temporarily
at the Singapore Buddhist Lodge.
Can the law punish an irresponsible singaporean husband done and said
what are singapore law for?

Posted: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 4:05 am
by Plavt
Posted: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 6:42 am
by Quasimodo
May, please, please follow through on your promise to leave us alone. You are a very, very ill person.
Posted: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:30 am
by earthfriendly
Okie, May4, you are at it again. I understand the situation this poor woman is in but how in the world do you expect the law to intervene in such family issues?
You seem to blame and think it is all about the man's responsibility. What about the woman taking some responsibility for herself? If she is not with a trustworthy man, isn't it prudent to not go to bed with him, let alone have his baby? The whole world and Singapore will be in huge chaos if all the law enforcement does is to meddle into the affairs of personal lives.
Re: Pitiful Sight
Posted: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 2:21 pm
by Quasimodo
[quote="may4"]China bride dumped bacause she wanted to keep baby
Husband: I DUMPED my wife because she decided to have the baby against my will.
Mrs Ng spent her first night at a neighbourhood police post, but is now putting up temporarily
at the Singapore Buddhist Lodge.
Can the law punish an irresponsible singaporean husband done and said
what are singapore law for? "
Ok, whackhead may4 - I'll bite.
'have the baby afainst my will' - I will presume two consenting adults had sex and one wanted to keep the baby, the other did not. What's the solution?
Why should the law punish this man? Do you kow the whole story? Singapore law is there so that people who break the law are caught and punished for this breach of the law.
Singapore law is not there to interven in domestic disputes of this kind.
I am presuming thatb you are eitehr Korean or a Mainlander as your English is completely un-Singaporean and your constant tirades against Caucasians, Japanese and Singaporeans is so very similar in tone to the Communist Propaganda that keeps people stupid - I guess with you they have succeeded.
Oh, are you even married, or is this Japanese husband in your mind as well?
Posted: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:01 pm
by may4
Everyone can have their view point. You can have your right to distinguish particular races,
just likewise the westernise people emphasis on "Human Right", so am I.
I dislike particular races. For instance, Caucasian , "Singaporean Men" & "Muslim Men".
Neither of them can get good relationship with me nor I allowed these ppl to get into my
world . I chose my current husband because he is a rational japanese man. I chose a
korean friend because he is a rational boss
You distinguish my world because you think I am from mainland or korean, Right?
But one sad and bitter true to be admit is that I am born Singaporean. How I wish
I were born korean or mainland so I won't be struggling with English.
I struggled myself, remained in primary three not even got my PSLE PASSED
I blamed it all on the Cambrigde English, I've been using up most of my time learning English
and ended up losses everything. And now you distinguish me due to my English's is weird
nothing more I can say, unless you find me Soo ill, I can leave my world without you too
but please don't forget there are many other choices for me making some other friend in this
forum, unless you disapproval my entries into your forum

Posted: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:26 pm
by sapphire
Good Lord!
Posted: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:40 pm
by Plavt
may4 wrote:I dislike particular races. For instance, Caucasian , "Singaporean Men" & "Muslim Men".
Neither of them can get good relationship with me nor I allowed these ppl to get into my
world
I would say the reverse is true .i.e.: YOU cannot get a good relationship with them but when you come here and make the remarks that you do is that surprising? As for 'getting into your world' as you put it, why would anybody want to when you are as always irrational? You sound a very sad person indeed. Are you aware of what you are actually saying?
Plavt.
Posted: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 8:24 am
by Quasimodo
may4, get some help, seriously.
Posted: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 9:04 am
by tiki
The statement, 'Neither of them can get good relationship with me nor I allowed these ppl to get into my
world...' shows a person who discriminates others by the colour of their skin and by their upbringing.
I reckon not only should the person making this statement be 'distinguished' for their narrow loathing attitude but they should also be 'extinguished' from this forum...and take their nonsensical 'anguish' somewhere, preferably to a 'place up the creek, where the sun doesn't shine.'
Posted: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 5:23 pm
by may4
earthfriendly wrote:Okie, May4, you are at it again. I understand the situation this poor woman is in but how in the world do you expect the law to intervene in such family issues?
You seem to blame and think it is all about the man's responsibility. What about the woman taking some responsibility for herself? If she is not with a trustworthy man, isn't it prudent to not go to bed with him, let alone have his baby? The whole world and Singapore will be in huge chaos if all the law enforcement does is to meddle into the affairs of personal lives.
You sound really bad guy, bro. I guess most probably you can't be
able to settle down, and no girl dares to get into the marriage tomb
which set up by you.
your statement makes no logic, most probably you might scared off
those girl who can consider you but at the same time worried she has
to consider if she should go to bed with you after married or she might
get dumped by you once she's pregnant.
Posted: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:55 am
by Quasimodo
Come on, SE - support the whacked woman in her tirades.
Posted: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 1:02 pm
by Strong Eagle
Quasimodo wrote:Come on, SE - support the whacked woman in her tirades.
She tends to see the world in a rather black and white fashion... like you.
Posted: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 2:28 pm
by earthfriendly
Strong Eagle wrote:Quasimodo wrote:Come on, SE - support the whacked woman in her tirades.
She tends to see the world in a rather black and white fashion... like you.
Just like moi, which is perhaps why I understood her posts so well. People have told me that there are many grey areas in life, which I totally agree (I am not that stupid nor naive, okie).
However, if humans stop making excuses for themselves and treat most issues like it is black and white, world will be much easeir to live in and many man-made problems/issues will go away. That's just my bias as I strive to live a simple live (albiet one filled with lots of material goods. Hee, hee, I am a SGean after all and one of my fav pasttime is shopping).
To provide an e.g of what I mean. I recalled Larry King (or one of those TV host) interveiwed Ross Perot. He asked RP if Lewiski were to seduce the former, what would he had done. RP, without any hesitation, said he would phone Lewiskin's daddy and bring it to his attention. He was spot on. Lewiski was a very yound and impressionable lady when he had the affair with Clinton and a parental intervention could have saved the day/president Clinton.
The reason I admired Harry Truman was because he had a sign on his desk that read "the buck stops here" (something like that).
Posted: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 2:48 pm
by earthfriendly
And I would like to add to the above. Now that I have two little girls of my own, I find it a lot easier to teach/explain to them the black and white of life rather than the shades of grey.