Stirring the Pot - American Politics Version
Posted: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:06 pm
Nothing to see folks...
Singapore Expats
Singapore Expats Forum
https://www.singaporeexpats.com/forum/
Stirring the Pot - American Politics Version
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:08 pm
Posted: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:19 pm
Posted: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:29 pm
What I find funny is, aren't you a republican?
Posted: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 7:47 am
Uhhhh... that would be a large 'no'. Way back in history I was. Then I became a Republican precinct chair. I ran my precinct convention and attended the state convention. When I began to hear such niceties as "gay marriage is the cause of so many single mothers" I knew it was time to move on.nakatago wrote:What I find funny is, aren't you a republican?
I'll never vote for a Republican again as long as I live.
Posted: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 3:43 pm
How is they seemed to have gained so much ground in the last 20 years?
Posted: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 5:55 pm
Because people are voting for them.
Posted: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:11 pm
(Slow clap)Strong Eagle wrote:Uhhhh... that would be a large 'no'. Way back in history I was. Then I became a Republican precinct chair. I ran my precinct convention and attended the state convention. When I began to hear such niceties as "gay marriage is the cause of so many single mothers" I knew it was time to move on.nakatago wrote:What I find funny is, aren't you a republican?
)
I'll never vote for a Republican again as long as I live.
Posted: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:13 pm
Is that a slow clap as in to signify boredom?
Posted: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:34 am
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/01/opini ... romney.htm
Explains Mitt Romney's flip-floppiness. And also why Republicans support him now but don't know why (and the tepid endorsements, most probably).
Not so safe for people who don't get American politics or quantum physics, sensitive Romney supporters, or anti-science types (e.g. Rick Santorum).
Explains Mitt Romney's flip-floppiness. And also why Republicans support him now but don't know why (and the tepid endorsements, most probably).
Not so safe for people who don't get American politics or quantum physics, sensitive Romney supporters, or anti-science types (e.g. Rick Santorum).
Posted: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 7:00 pm
The skills required to win elections and the skills required to govern are not the same. They are good enough at winning elections that many people don't care how poorly they govern.movingtospore wrote:How is they seemed to have gained so much ground in the last 20 years?
Posted: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 7:52 pm
Obamy sure proved that point, fieldhead! 
Posted: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 9:52 pm
He had to be talking about Bush, mate.sundaymorningstaple wrote:Obamy sure proved that point, fieldhead!
Posted: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 2:17 pm
Bush didn't win the election, he stole itStrong Eagle wrote:He had to be talking about Bush, mate.sundaymorningstaple wrote:Obamy sure proved that point, fieldhead!
Posted: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 3:10 pm
So, with that in mind, It must have been Obamy.