Page 1 of 1

Indian PR

Posted: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 3:34 pm
by meetmeat10pm
Hi Guys,
Please share your thoughts on the below , I am Indian PR and wish to
What are the things I need to look into before i get married.

where is the best place to get married.


should I apply for dependent pass after marraige or should i apply for dependent PR.

please share your thoughts.

rgds

Re: Indian PR marrying a Filipina

Posted: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 4:41 am
by Mad Scientist
meetmeat10pm wrote:Hi Guys,
Please share your thoughts on the below , I am Indian PR and wish to marry my 2 years Filipina girl.

What are the things I need to look into before i get married.

This has been discussed at length . Go to the search button under the profile link and type PR marrying foreigner etc.
You need to get permission from MOM before getting married.
If your gf has worked in SG before under Work Permit, more than ever you need to get MOM approval

where is the best place to get married.

currently my GF is working in Philipines, what is the best way to bring her here, is it getting married in sg or in philipines.
Either here or both. Make sure get permission before ROM in SG. Marriage of covenience is a ploy that ICA is always on the lookout

should I apply for dependent pass after marraige or should i apply for dependent PR.
If you are PR you CANNOT apply DP . You should apply LTSVP
http://ltpass.ica.gov.sg/eltsvp/FAQ.html

please share your thoughts.

rgds

Re: Indian PR marrying a Filipina

Posted: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 6:01 am
by longstebe
meetmeat10pm wrote:Hi Guys,
Please share your thoughts on the below , I am Indian PR and wish to marry my 2 years Filipina girl.

What are the things I need to look into before i get married.

where is the best place to get married.

currently my GF is working in Philipines, what is the best way to bring her here, is it getting married in sg or in philipines.

should I apply for dependent pass after marraige or should i apply for dependent PR.

please share your thoughts.

rgds
Isn't she a bit young to get married :lol:

Posted: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 7:01 am
by sundaymorningstaple
I actually wondered the same thing! :o

But then, see he's on the wrong forum, at least if he's an Indian PR (I don't know why anybody would want to voluntarily go to India and take up PR) :???: :P

globalised English

Posted: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:12 pm
by senkalmag
sundaymorningstaple wrote:I actually wondered the same thing! :o

But then, see he's on the wrong forum, at least if he's an Indian PR (I don't know why anybody would want to voluntarily go to India and take up PR) :???: :P
I think your native English language skills need to be updated to globalised English standards.

What he meant is that he is an Indian who is a PR in Singapore. This is the modern sms generation English.

Sorry could be the generation gap :(

Re: globalised English

Posted: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 3:36 am
by Mad Scientist
senkalmag wrote:
sundaymorningstaple wrote:I actually wondered the same thing! :o

But then, see he's on the wrong forum, at least if he's an Indian PR (I don't know why anybody would want to voluntarily go to India and take up PR) :???: :P
I think your native English language skills need to be updated to globalised English standards.

What he meant is that he is an Indian who is a PR in Singapore. This is the modern sms generation English.

Sorry could be the generation gap :(
Mate !! You are barking on the wrong tree. :?

Posted: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 7:21 am
by sundaymorningstaple
MS, he's just another example of the low quality of "foreign talent" we are seeing here now. He is a good example of why the local population is up in arms.

Obviously his "global" English is only used by the "Indian" diaspora and not the the Native English speaking world at large, so he can be forgiven as he's a good example why Singapore recognizes so very few Indian universities.

:roll: :wink:

and

Posted: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 9:33 am
by Garlickbred
and barking "on" a tree is the correct usage of the phrase? Methinks not, and I'm hardly a native English speaker. :roll:

Re: and

Posted: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 9:52 am
by Mad Scientist
Garlickbred wrote:and barking "on" a tree is the correct usage of the phrase? Methinks not, and I'm hardly a native English speaker. :roll:
Yeah!! typo error and not proof reading b4 posting on my part. I am not native English speaker too. So..... you are definitely my long loss English Teacher that has gone missing!!!!

but

Posted: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:13 am
by Garlickbred
Never liked my English teacher anyway. Just thought it interesting that a post originally asking for information on marital / immig law took a detour into the curry bashers club.

Re: but

Posted: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:48 pm
by Mad Scientist
Garlickbred wrote:Never liked my English teacher anyway. Just thought it interesting that a post originally asking for information on marital / immig law took a detour into the curry bashers club.
No one got bashed if you cared to read the OP Post. It was meant to be a tongue in cheek phrase. It became to this when senkalmag post to SMS. If you cared to read his/her other postings, you would know what I meant .

I was trying to poke back at senkalmag for barking AT THE WRONG TREE. That is all. Base on the IP address you can roughly guess where they are from.

up

Posted: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 2:23 pm
by Garlickbred
just for future ref, it's "up" the wrong tree :D sry, could'nt resist. Anyway I was not alluding to your post as the catalyst for the thread getting derailed, just making an observation.

Posted: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 8:36 pm
by longstebe
Is this the " no sense of humour " thread?

Posted: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 9:19 pm
by nakatago
Image
The Colonel wrote:I'm sorry, I'm not prepared to pursue my line of enquiry any further as I think this is getting too silly.