in your opinion, which airline you consider to be the best?Matney wrote:Don't know why. In my opinion, SQ isn't the best airline, at least not the best one I have flown and I've probably flown about 2 dozen different ones. Of the airlines based out of Asia, I guess SQ would be one of the better ones, but I couldn't say the best. I'm talking from the passenger point of view, not as an employee or spouse of one.
i don't think this is true anymore. if you said it 5 years ago i would agree definitely. but now, things have changed, for example, the height requirement has dropped, the number of interview stages have dropped. if you look at some of the older stewardesses and now, you'll see the difference.durain wrote:SQ does set the standard higher and this is reflected by their inflight service. but one must not feel they are second best just because they cant get into SQ.
I agree with you.Matney wrote:Don't know why. In my opinion, SQ isn't the best airline, at least not the best one I have flown and I've probably flown about 2 dozen different ones. Of the airlines based out of Asia, I guess SQ would be one of the better ones, but I couldn't say the best. I'm talking from the passenger point of view, not as an employee or spouse of one.
hands up.queenie-me wrote:I agree with you.Matney wrote:Don't know why. In my opinion, SQ isn't the best airline, at least not the best one I have flown and I've probably flown about 2 dozen different ones. Of the airlines based out of Asia, I guess SQ would be one of the better ones, but I couldn't say the best. I'm talking from the passenger point of view, not as an employee or spouse of one.
i agree.ryanstarr wrote:I've done it all-served NS and reservist, flown for both the Singapore owned airlines, SQ and TR. As a Singaporean, there is no greater honour than to have been picked to fly for your National Carrier....
Has it?theknees wrote:the height requirement has dropped,
I agree, my first flight was in 1999, since then some of the stewardesses seem both bitchy and dis-interested while a good number of the males a both pig-headed and arrogant.the number of interview stages have dropped. if you look at some of the older stewardesses and now, you'll see the difference.
i think Emirates has a high standard. it is so difficult to get through their interviews!
i dont know how emirates do it as they got one of the cheapest airfare. must be the cheaper fuel they are getting in dubai coz that is a big factor in saving cost.Plavt wrote:i think Emirates has a high standard. it is so difficult to get through their interviews!
No doubt, although I don't know they probably have to pay a premium for the privilege of recruiting Singaporean citizens.
Very probably since fuel is the most expensive running cost of an airline, normally it is staff wages. Yes fuel is very cheap in the gulf states: no import or long-distance travel costs or high taxes.durain wrote:
i dont know how emirates do it as they got one of the cheapest airfare. must be the cheaper fuel they are getting in dubai coz that is a big factor in saving cost.
The question here was different. It was:rainschocolate wrote:i agree.ryanstarr wrote:I've done it all-served NS and reservist, flown for both the Singapore owned airlines, SQ and TR. As a Singaporean, there is no greater honour than to have been picked to fly for your National Carrier....
its like representing your own country and being proud of it.
recognize SQ's hardwork in making SIA such a reputable airlines thruout all these years, there must be a reason for its accomplishments!
Yes, i would have to agree with you. SQ basically looks alot at one's personality...whether u r fit for the job. This was wat one of the senior vice-presidents told me too after my management interview. He said that they dun necessarily go for the preetiest or slimmest...but they wud select sumone whom they deemed fit for the job. Becoz they believe that by getting a personality fit, only then would the employee excel in wat he/she is doing. This was wat he told me....theknees wrote:i don't think this is true anymore. if you said it 5 years ago i would agree definitely. but now, things have changed, for example, the height requirement has dropped, the number of interview stages have dropped. if you look at some of the older stewardesses and now, you'll see the difference.durain wrote:SQ does set the standard higher and this is reflected by their inflight service. but one must not feel they are second best just because they cant get into SQ.
i think Emirates has a high standard. it is so difficult to get through their interviews!
but i suppose you cannot compare airline to airline. each has its own criteria, some going for looks, some going for personality, etc.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests